City Demographic Trends and Population Analysis
Analyzing the demographic evolution of a community provides critical insights into its social and economic trajectory. Over the last six decades, this city has experienced a steady and significant decline in its resident population, shifting from a small community of 100 people in 1960 to an estimated 39 residents by 2022. This trend reflects broader patterns of rural or small-town migration and aging populations.
Key Facts
- Population Decline: The population dropped from 100 in 1960 to an estimated 39 in 2022.
- Racial Composition: As of the 2010 census, the city was 100% White.
- Aging Trend: The median age rose significantly from 36 years in 2000 to 52.5 years in 2010.
- Household Structure: Non-family households became dominant, making up 53.8% of all households by 2010.
- Gender Ratio: The 2010 census recorded a male majority at 56.5%.
Population History and Trends
The city's population has seen a consistent downward trend since 1970. While the decline was gradual during the first two decades, it accelerated sharply between 1980 and 2010, with the most significant single-decade drop occurring between 2000 and 2010, where the population decreased by 25.8%.
| Census Year | Population | Percentage Change (%) |
|---|---|---|
| 1960 | 100 | — |
| 1970 | 99 | −1.0% |
| 1980 | 97 | −2.0% |
| 1990 | 77 | −20.6% |
| 2000 | 62 | −19.5% |
| 2010 | 46 | −25.8% |
| 2020 | 40 | −13.0% |
| 2022 (est.) | 39 | −2.5% |
[ไม่มีภาพประกอบ]
Detailed Census Analysis
2010 Census Insights
By 2010, the city consisted of 46 residents across 26 households and 12 families. The population density—the number of people living per unit of area—was 46.5 inhabitants per square mile. The city's racial makeup was recorded as 100% White.
Household dynamics shifted toward smaller, non-family units. Non-families represented 53.8% of households, and 46.2% of all households consisted of individuals living alone. Notably, 19.2% of households featured a person aged 65 or older living alone. The average household size was 1.77, while the average family size was 2.42.
The age distribution showed a heavily weighted older population, with 50% of residents falling between the ages of 45 and 64. The median age was 52.5 years. In terms of gender, the population was 56.5% male and 43.5% female.
2000 Census Insights
In 2000, the population was larger at 62 people, with a population density of 62.4 inhabitants per square mile. The racial composition was more diverse than in 2010, consisting of 95.16% White, 1.61% Native American, 1.61% from other races, and 1.61% from two or more races. Hispanic or Latino residents made up 1.61% of the population.
The household structure in 2000 was more family-oriented, with 30.8% of households having children under 18. The median age was significantly lower at 36 years. The gender imbalance was more pronounced, with 158.3 males for every 100 females.
Economic data from 2000 revealed a median household income of $30,000 and a median family income of $36,250. The per capita income—the average income earned per person—was $16,211. Poverty levels were notable, with 20.0% of families and 22.2% of the total population living below the poverty line, including 22.2% of those over age 64.
Frequently Asked Questions
How has the population changed since 1960?
The population has declined steadily from 100 residents in 1960 to an estimated 39 residents in 2022.
What was the racial makeup of the city in 2010?
According to the 2010 census, the city's racial makeup was 100% White.
How did the median age change between 2000 and 2010?
The median age increased significantly, rising from 36 years in 2000 to 52.5 years in 2010.
What was the economic status of the city in 2000?
In 2000, the median household income was $30,000, and approximately 22.2% of the population lived below the poverty line.
What is the current estimated population?
As of 2022, the estimated population of the city is 39 people.