Battle of New OrleansAndrew JacksonWar of 1812Chalmette BattlefieldEdward Pakenham

Battle of New Orleans: The Decisive Clash of the War of 1812

Battle of New Orleans: The Decisive Clash of the War of 1812 The Battle of New Orleans stands as one of the most famous engagements in American military history. Fought on January 8, 1815...

Battle of New Orleans: The Decisive Clash of the War of 1812

The Battle of New Orleans stands as one of the most famous engagements in American military history. Fought on January 8, 1815, this conflict occurred during the closing stages of the War of 1812. Despite the war technically nearing its end, the battle resulted in a stunning American victory that cemented the reputation of Andrew Jackson and bolstered national pride.

The conflict was not merely a clash of professional armies but a diverse gathering of forces. The American defense included regular soldiers, militia, and volunteers, while the British sought to seize the strategic port of New Orleans to control the Mississippi River.

Lake Borgne, Louisiana, 1720.
Lake Borgne, Louisiana, 1720.

Key Facts

  • Date: January 8, 1815
  • Location: Near New Orleans, Louisiana (Chalmette Battlefield)
  • American Commander: Andrew Jackson
  • British Commander: Edward Pakenham
  • Outcome: Decisive American victory
  • American Casualties: 71 total (13 dead, 39 wounded, 19 missing/captured)
  • British Casualties: 2,037 total (291 dead, 1,262 wounded, 484 missing/captured)

The Road to Chalmette

The campaign began in earnest on December 23, 1814. General Andrew Jackson coordinated a diverse force, including the support of warships in the Mississippi River such as the USS Louisiana, USS Carolina, and USS Eagle, along with the steamboat Enterprise. By late December, Jackson had mustered approximately 3,300 men, bolstered by Major Thomas Hinds' squadron of light dragoons from the Mississippi Territory.

Affair Below New Orleans: December 23, 1814[28]
Affair Below New Orleans: December 23, 1814[28]

The British strategy involved a complex approach, including movements through Lake Borgne and subsequent disembarkations. As the British forces pushed toward the city, they encountered a well-fortified American line at Chalmette.

Plan of the city and suburbs of New Orleans : from an actual survey made in 1815
Plan of the city and suburbs of New Orleans from an 1815 survey[34]

The Diverse American Force

One of the most notable aspects of Jackson's army was its composition. The defense relied on a mixture of professional soldiers and irregulars, including Free Men of Colour and Choctaw Indian Volunteers, illustrating the broad coalition assembled to protect the Gulf Coast.

H. Charles McBarron, Free Men of Colour and Choctaw Indian Volunteers at New Orleans, Louisiana (1982)
H. Charles McBarron, Free Men of Colour and Choctaw Indian Volunteers at New Orleans, Louisiana (1982)

The Battle of January 8

The climax of the campaign occurred on January 8, 1815. The Americans had constructed a formidable defensive position known as Line Jackson. This line featured various batteries, including Battery 4, which housed a massive naval 32-pounder gun transferred from the USS Carolina.

Battery 4, in the middle of Line Jackson, contained the biggest American artillery gun, a naval 32-pounder that was transferred from the USS Carolina before she was sunk by the British.
Battery 4, in the middle of Line Jackson, contained the biggest American artillery gun, a naval 32-pounder that was transferred from the USS Carolina before she was sunk by the British.

The British assault was aimed primarily at the Left Bank, specifically targeting the area beyond Batteries 5 and 6. However, the British faced significant logistical hurdles. While the Americans utilized a mix of army and naval artillery, the British relied heavily on naval guns. These pieces, characterized by small wheels and large frames, became bogged down in the muddy fields of Chalmette, hindering their mobility and effectiveness.

Two examples of artillery pieces on Line Jackson. The one on the right is naval artillery and the left one is army artillery. The Americans used both equally. The British used mostly naval artillery during the campaign and with the small wheels and large frames these guns became bogged down in the muddy fields of Chalmette.
Two examples of artillery pieces on Line Jackson. The one on the right is naval artillery and the left one is army artillery. The Americans used both equally. The British used mostly naval artillery during the campaign and with the small wheels and large frames these guns became bogged down in the muddy fields of Chalmette.

The assault ended in disaster for the British. Major General Sir Edward Pakenham was killed during the engagement, and the British forces were forced to retreat with staggering losses compared to the minimal American casualties.

The Death of Pakenham at the Battle of New Orleans by F. O. C. Darley shows the death of British Maj. Gen. Sir Edward Pakenham on January 8, 1815
The Death of Pakenham at the Battle of New Orleans by F. O. C. Darley shows the death of British Maj. Gen. Sir Edward Pakenham on January 8, 1815
The Battle of New Orleans: Situation on 8 January 1815
The Battle of New Orleans: Situation on 8 January 1815
Battle of New Orleans: Jan. 8th
Battle of New Orleans: Jan. 8th
E. Percy Moran, The Battle of New Orleans (1910)
E. Percy Moran, The Battle of New Orleans (1910)

Analysis and Aftermath

The disparity in casualties is one of the most remarkable elements of the battle. Official American records cite only 71 total losses. British losses are more disputed; while some reports suggest 2,037 total casualties, other dispatches from Colonel Arthur P. Hayne estimated 700 fatalities and 1,400 wounded. Regardless of the exact figure, the British defeat was absolute.

Following the defeat, the British withdrew from the region. The victory had profound political outcomes in the United States, elevating Andrew Jackson to the status of a national hero and influencing the trajectory of American historiography.

British Generals Pakenham and Gibbs Memorial at St. Paul's Cathedral in London
British Generals Pakenham and Gibbs Memorial at St. Paul's Cathedral in London
Chalmette Monument
Chalmette Monument

Summary of Forces and Losses

Battle of New Orleans Comparison
Metric United States United Kingdom
Commanders Andrew Jackson Edward Pakenham
Approx. Strength 5,700 8,000
Dead 13 291
Wounded 39 1,262
Missing/Captured 19 484
Total Casualties 71 2,037
Sesquicentennial issue of 1965
Sesquicentennial issue of 1965

Frequently Asked Questions

Who led the American forces at the Battle of New Orleans?

The American forces were led by General Andrew Jackson, who was supported by other leaders including Daniel Patterson, Pushmataha, and the privateer Jean Lafitte.

Why did the British artillery struggle during the battle?

The British primarily used naval artillery, which featured small wheels and large frames. These designs were unsuitable for the terrain, causing the guns to become bogged down in the muddy fields of Chalmette.

What was the significance of Line Jackson?

Line Jackson was the primary American defensive fortification. It utilized strategic batteries and a mix of army and naval artillery to repel the British assault with minimal casualties.

How did the casualties compare between the two sides?

The casualties were heavily skewed; the Americans suffered only 71 total losses, while the British suffered over 2,000 casualties, including 291 dead and 1,262 wounded.

What happened to the British commander, Sir Edward Pakenham?

Major General Sir Edward Pakenham was killed during the battle on January 8, 1815, as the British attempted their assault on the American lines.

References

  1. The monthly returns for British forces in North America, archive reference WO 17/1218, prepared on the 25th day of the month, provide valuable details on unit strengths. Images of the original documents can be seen on microfilm at The Historic New Orleans Collection's research center. Transcriptions of the returns are online and can be downloaded via Bamford 2014.
  2. Quoting Jackson's report dated January 14, 1815.[4] and reproduction of Adjutant General Robert Butler's casualty report to Brigadier General Parker dated January 16, 1815.[5]
  3. 'Nor did he [Bunbury] favour attacking New Orleans... the target looked difficult with nightmarish navigation, climate, and logistics.... Despite Bunbury's incisive critique, an attack on New Orleans was ordered.'[11]
  4. Gene Allen Smith makes reference to a letter from the Secretary of the Admiralty to Cochrane dated August 10, 1814. A copy of this document is accessible at The Historic New Orleans Collection, via microfilm. Smith also mentions how several Royal Navy officers had suggested the idea of attacking Louisiana from 1813 onwards.[12]
  5. Refer to the map of Louisiana.